It is my favorite time of year, not just because it's light out later, and wamer, and crocus flowers are popping up in surprising places, but because our Penny Harvest kids are deciding what they're going to do with all that money they collected in the fall! Our 54 schools are in the process of determining what to do with more than $82,000 collectively!
For one school with a $2,000 budget, that could mean deciding between 2,000 toothbrushes for the Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation, or $2,000 worth of food and veterinary care to the lions, tigers and bears at The Wild Animal Sanctuary.
For another school with $1,000 to give, their discussions may be circling around providing 500 hot dogs for the children with cancer that attend the Fishing Derby though Joseph's Journey, or providing a camp scholarship to a child with cancer or their sibling to Camp Wapiyapi this summer.
Another school with $1,000 to give has discovered that a family within their own community is struggling with a new cancer diagnosis for one of their very own classmates and they are voting to give every penny of their grant money to help that family.
Through all these discussions, the kids are asking great questions. Time and time again, we hear from the organizations that have been interviewed that these are their most nervewracking sessions with potential funders, and often the best questions!
I have noticed that we are passing certain questions - and ideologies - down to our kids from a cutural mindset about how non-profits should work. I have heard our kids ask "how much of our money will go to your programs, versus your salary?" In the non-profit world we're used to these questions, we expect them from our funders. So why not from our kids that have grant money to give?
Well, Dan Palotta questions that very mentality that has us asking those questions in this intriguing Ted Talks video, The Way We Think About Charity is Dead Wrong. It truly has me wondering that perhaps the questions we should be talking about with our kids - as well as our funders - should take a very different tack. Rather than "how much of this money is going to go to the programs", how about "how will our money help you make the biggest impact?" And from organization to organization, maybe it is the toothbrushes, or maybe it's being able to hire another person to help with the avalanche of toothbrushes and donations coming in from caring kids and their families from around the country. Maybe it's paying for food for big cats, or a much less glamourous software program that will help the staff keep track of their animals' costs and run an efficient, sustainable organization.
In any case, our kids are having great discussions, asking great questions, and I am looking forward to seeing the results of all their great debates.
Here are a couple pictures from Meiklejohn's Roundtable Meeting, on a conference call with St. Jude's.


